Ово су закључци једне прилично обимне студије под називом "Зарубинецкая культура и латенизированные культуры Европы" од Пачкове С.П. која може да се прочита на сљедећем линку
http://www.archaeology.ru/Download/Pachkova/Pachkova_2006_Zarubinetzkaja.pdfДајем овдје њене крајње закључке на енглеском:
Based on results of this study we can draw the following conclusions:
1. The Zarubinets Culture consolidated the territories that in the previous Scythian period were occupied by several different in ethnical and cultural respect tribes. Elements of preceding cultures can be identified in Zarubinets Culture's archeological materials, but they are not numerous because of the change of life standards and values. The Zarubinets Culture was not a direct successor of any preceding culture.
2. Comparative study of major categories of archeological materials from different territories revealed significant regional differences - in the type of residential habitat house, women jewellery,
elements of funeral ritual and clay ceramics complex. The closest relations were maintained between MidDnieper and Polesie regions. Upper Dnieper region seems more isolated. All These three regions were mostly connected by so called "fibula of Zarubinets type" which is a special kind of fibula - with triangular ending of stem.
3. The Zarubinets Culture belonged to the group of latenized cultures each of which has strikingly distinctive character. Formation of latenized cultures occurred according to general historical development patterns. As a result, all latenized cultures were more or less connected to each other. The connection of the Zarubinets Culture to each individual latenized culture is very specific.
4. Comparison of artifacts from Zarubinets burial grounds and Oksyv burial ground "Prusch-10" on the Baltic Sea coast suggested that there were no close connections between populations of these cultures, especially at the early stages. Revealed common features are not sufficient for proclaiming significant contribution of Oksyvsky Culture to the initial development of the Zarubinets Culture. Moreover, there is no reason to declare the resettlement of native Oksyv people to Upper Podneprovie region.
5. Pshevorsk Culture was located nearby Zarubinets Culture territories. Common types of ceramics and fibulas does not allow to make a conclusion on their complete isolation, although their relations cannot be described as intensive especially at the beginning of their development. But still, the closest connections are registered between the Pshevorsk Culture and Zarubinets Polesie, less intense relations - with Upper Podneprovie region.
6. Comparative study of major categories of archeological materials of Zarubinets and PoeneshtLukashevka Cultures allowed to identify distinctive set of traditional domestic features representing
specific core of each culture.
7. The contribution of Yastorf cultural groups to the Poenesht-Lukashevka Culture was much bigger than to the Zarubinets Culture. It can be observed in the specific structure of their ceramic complexes, close funeral rituals, almost similar fibula sets and belt accessories.
8. The Zarubinets Culture was situated off the main road of Bastarns to the Balkans. As a result, less number of Yastorf migrants came here that probably was reflected in the material complex of the Zarubinets Culture. Structure of ceramic complex in Zarubinets and Yastorf Cultures is very different. The funeral ritual in the Zarubinets Culture is very specific and adopted only few elements from the Yastorf one. Zarubinets and Yastorf fibula complexes are also very different, although certain fibula types are similar. All the above makes difficult to combine Zarubinets and Yastorf Cultures into one community as it was suggested by Schukin M.B.
9. All latenized cultures were strongly influenced by Celts. "Celtic veil" of each of them had specific features.
Celts features penetrated to the Zarubinets Culture by two major paths. The first is the northwest path which is associated with migrants from Northern and Central Europe (primarily with representatives of the Yastorf Culture and other people that joined them during their migration). This path and the newly acquired latenization style can be called "Yastorf or "Bastarn" path. The second is the southwest path which originated from Laten and Laten Illiriya Cultures in Carpathian-Dniestr-Danub region. This style can be called "South-Western" or "Laten." It was brought into the Zarubinets Culture by Zarubinets people themselves from Polesie and Podneprovie when they participated in Bastarnian trips since the first Bastarnian invasion into Podunavie at the end of the 3rd century B. A. Везано за горњу преписку сунца и Николе, треба обратити на овај болдовани дио посљедње тачке.