Што се тиче ове Meczoscat културе, постоји један интересантан рад хрватског археолога Потребице, који опет наводи цитат њемачког археолога Carola Metzner-Nebelsick која се интензивније бавила управо овом културом. Тако Потребица каже:
"The most important recent contributions to the subject are those of C. Metzner-Nebelsick.. She studied closely Fuzesabony-Mezocsat group in the eastern Hungary and its influences on neighboring cultural groups. The most important features of that group are nomadic way of life and skeletal burial that have parallels in Pontic аnd Caucasian area but significantly differs from the incineration burials of neighboring. Eastern Hallstatt groups that continue tradition of the Urnfield Culture (Metzner-Nebelsick, 1998, 361-422)"
Тестирани N1a је управо по аутосомалној днк показивао блискост са кавкаским простором, тако да овај навод Кароле има смисла.
Иначе малоприје сам написоа да је овај N1 P189 ,а заправо није. Он има СНП Y6503 на који су позитивни и наши N1 P189, али је негативан на P189.
Ево шта о тој култури каже Тибор Кеменчеи, мађарски археолог који ју је проучавао:
...often contained articles that
were not the products of the metal workshops of the Tisza
region. These artefact types were not developed by local
craftsmen since most of them are demonstrably modelled
on similar types in the pre-Scythian assemblages of the
steppe north of the Pontic.
Prehistorians have since long been aware of the similarities
between the Early Iron Age horse harness and weapons
from the Carpathian Basin and the steppe. In their study on
the pre-Scythian bits from the Carpathian Basin published in
1939, Sándor Gallus and Tibor Horváth noted that these
finds were part of the archaeological heritage of an eastern,
mounted nomad population. Some prehistorians shared this
view, while others believed that these Early Iron Age harness
finds reached the Carpathian Basin through trade or as a result
of contact between the élites of these two regions.
The Early Iron Age burials from the Great Hungarian
Plain provided important new information for settling this
controversial issue since the burial rite resembled the mortuary
practices of the pre-Scythian period in the steppe. It
therefore seems likely that the Mezõcsát communities were
not descended from the local Late Bronze Age population,
but had arrived to the Great Hungarian Plain from the east.
According to the Greek historian Herodotus (484–425
B.C.), the steppe was inhabited by the Cimmerians, a
mounted nomad people, in the 9th–8th centuries B.C.
Some prehistorians have argued that the eastern artefact
types and the eastern burial rite of the Early Iron Age in the
Danube–Tisza region are proof of the westward migration
of a Cimmerian group. However,
the Cimmerians were but
one of the many groups populating the steppe and thus the
identification of this eastern population with a specific
steppean people is no more than speculation.The bit type with a mouthpiece of two jointed canons
was developed in the metal workshops of the Kuban valley,
north of the Caucasus. The bridle ornament decorated with
three interlocking bird heads also reflects the artistic spirit
of the steppe.
Мислим да је на форуму протумачено да негативни резултат на P189 код Мезочат скелета говори о томе да су они били могућа предачка популација том хаплотипу? Или је то погрешно расуђивање?
