Могуће је да смо добили (
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?14480-Heatmaps-for-I2a1-subclades&p=870041&viewfull=1#post870041) први археохенетски узорак I-Y84307, из истраживања "The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe" (
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm4247).
"TUR_I10430 is definitely Y3120+, but almost nothing derived below. I did find one derived SNP in clade Y93273, formed by two Croatians, along with two ancestral SNPs:
Y101738+ G>T (1T)
Y112550- C>T (7C)
BY87256- T>C (3T)
The good thing is it's a G>T transversion, so unlikely to be a consequence of aDNA damage, and the bad thing is it's not corroborated with derived SNPs at upstream levels between Y3120 and Y93273 (S17250, PH908 and Y84307)."
"As others said, sample from Turkey is probably Asia Minor Slav (7-9th century):
The other two individuals from this locality (I10546 / Byz2 and I10430 / Byz3) seem more probably denizens of the Empire of their time, with the former’s low and the latter’s high steppe and European hunter-gatherer ancestry respectively signifying that they stemmed from the Asian and European parts of the Empire. Byz3 has a remarkable amount of Balkan hunter-gatherer-related ancestry (19±3%) and no significant CHG ancestry and could very well also be someone from beyond the borders of the Empire from Europe.
Location of Ilıpınar Höyük (Bursa, Orhangazi) would have been in Opsician Theme, which is exactly the place where were settled Asia Minor Slavs, so that's checked. Depending on the accuracy of the date the individual could have arrived there or descend from various Slavic migrations (from Thrace) to Asia Minor between 7th and 9th century. One group supposedly founded the small district in near region of Bithynia (possibly near Nicomedia or further away, so at least 100 km from Ilıpınar), although there does exist some uncertainties about location, etymology and other. The PH908 subclade was found among Serbo-Croats and some Turkish individual with probably Balkan Turk origin so South Slavic matches are kind-of checked as well, but let's see the analysis by YFull. It's a pity upstream levels are without reads, for PH908 is understandable, but others isn't. Generally low coverage and this type of contradicting results is only making confusion in ancient DNA database, phylogenetic tree."