Није "ad hominem", овдје се говори о приступу археологији... Као што видимо у овом Рослундовом наводу...
Ne, radi se o ad hominem i zamjeni teza. Odbijate prihvatiti činjenice kako su stari arheološki
podaci bili pogrešni i sukladno tome stara
tumačenja. Vi stalno odvlačite pozornost na Bratherova
mišljenja u vezi odnosa etniciteta i arheologije koje je nebitno u cijeloj priči, izmišljate kako se radi o "zatvorenom krugu" znanstvenika, a pritom i pogrešno parafrazirate citirane autore izvlačeći napisano iz konteksta
nepravovaljanosti starih datiranja i opisa,
kako i zašto su stariji arheolozi poput Brachmanna teoretizirali više valova slavenskih migracija za vrijeme DDR. Vjerojatno je zbog vašeg lošeg razumijevanja engleskog i njemačkog jezika. Još niste citirali jednu direktnu kritiku ili jednog suvremenog arheologa koji zasebno tvrdi isto što Brachmann 70ih, a niti Loserta na kojeg se stalno pozivate. Samo iznosite vlastite osobne stavove i konstrukcije koje nisu nikakav argument.
Evo disertacija iz 2007. za koju je Losert bio recenzent: Stefan Koch,
Neue Erkenntnisse zur Stadtentstehung Leipzigs Ergebnisse der archäologischen Untersuchungenn im Nordwest-Viertel der Leipziger Innenstadt,
https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/278. Gdje se u njoj spominje drugi val slavenske (srpske) migracije iz smjera Podunavlja u 7. stoljeću?
Peter Ivanič, "Western Slavs in the 6th and 7th century",
https://www.academia.edu/6858449/Western_Slavs_in_the_6th_and_7th_century, 2012, str. 89-90:
Joachim Herrmann supposed the area along central Havel basin and lower Spree basin to be settled by the Slavs in the second half of the 6th century.50 Nowadays it is considered that Slavic settlement activity in the land along the Elbe and the Saale started around 600 or at the beginning of the 7th century. Coastal regions of Mecklenburg and Pomerania were probably inhabited not earlier than in the second half of the 7th century. The Slavs got to the land of eastern Holstein even later, i.e. after 700.51 Problematic issue is a relationship between Germanic inhabitants and the Slavs. The problem lies in distinguishing artefacts of undecorated vessels made in hand by Germanic inhabitants in the 6th century from those of the 7th century Slavs.52 It is now proved that there was a decline in Germanic settlements in the regions situated to the east of the Saale in the 6th century. Eastern Thuringia between the Saale and the Elbe was first inhabited by the Slavs in the last third of the 6th century.53 The presence of the Prague-type pottery was proved in the sites around the Elbe (e.g. Dessau-Mosigkau). The region around historical province of Lower Lusatia was settled by the representatives of the Sukow group, also called Sukow-Szeligi group. These cultures differ mostly in the shape of vessels, floor plans of their buildings (in the area of the SukowSzeligi group the floor plan holes have a longitudinal-oval shape).54 Michał Parczewski underlines the possibility that the Sukow-Szeligi group might have followed the Prague-type culture. Felix Biermann is much of the same opinion.55 The next wave of the Slavs was traditionally put into the 7th century. According to earlier theories, the Tornow group was believed to occur in Lower Lusatia, i.e. in the region of the Sukow-Szeligi group, and the Rüssen group was assumed to settle in the land along the Elbe. The Rüssen group was named after pottery which was decorated with small waves and referred to as Rüssen type. In the recent periods, however, such chronology regarding artefacts related to the above-mentioned groups as being traditionally dated back to the 7th century is challenged and the artefacts are believed to belong to later centuries.56
50 Joachimed Herrmann et al., Die Slawen in Deutschland: Geschichte und Kultur der slawischen Stämme westlich von Oder und Neiße vom 6. bis 12. Jahrhundert. Ein Handbuch (Berlin: Akademie – Verlag, 1970), 23.
51 Sebastian Brather, Archäologie der westlichen Slawen: Siedlung, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im früh – und hochmittelalterlichen Ostmitteleuropa (Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2001), 61. Marek Dulinicz, Frühe Slawen im Gebiet zwischen unterer Weichsel und Elbe (Neumünster: Wachholtz Verlag, 2006), 253, 259.
52 Brather, Archäologie der westlichen Slawen, 62.
53 Berthold Schmidt, “Thüringen – Franken – Sachsen – Slawen. Gesselschaftliche Veränderungen vom 6. bis 8. Jahrhndert in Mitteldeutschland,” Jahresschrift für Mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte 75 (1992): 313–323.
54 Felix Biermann, Slawische Besiedlung zwischen Elbe, Neisse und Lubsza: Archäologische Studien zum Siedlungswesen und zur Sachkultur des frühen und hohen Mittelalters. Ergebnisse und Materialien zum DFG – Projekt "Germanen – Slawen – Deutsche" (Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, 2000), 33–36.
55 Biermann, Slawische Besiedlung, 35–36. Parczewski, Die Anfänge, 125–128. 56Biermann, Slawische Besiedlung, 33–35.
Michel Kazanski, "Archaeology of the Slavic Migrations",
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02902087/file/Kazanski_Archaeology-Slavic%20Migrations_2020.pdf, 2020: ne piše ništa novoga o arheologiji Polablja jer se poziva na Brachmanna (1978) i Sedova (1995), ali iako propušta citirati noviju literaturu je oprezan pri iznošenu napisanog jer koristi termine poput "plausibly", "according to some researchers", "allegedly".